Mises.se skriver idag om elitens planer för hur de ska styra världen, vad deras slutliga mål är, dvs maktcentralisering m.m och hur detta skall uppnås. Här är några rader från inlägget: Den öppna konspirationen
1966 skrev professorn i historievetenskap, Carroll Quigley, som undervisat vid Harvard, Princeton och Foreign Service School vid Georgetown University, en exposé över vad han kallade ett ”internationellt nätverk” av internationella bankirer och andra superkapitalister som delade målsättningen att skapa ett världssystem för politisk och finansiell kontroll. Quigley skriver:
There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact this network, which we may identitfy as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies…but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.
Carrol Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, sid 950. Macmillan Co: 1966.
Men hur skulle då ”kapitalismens” kontroll kunna ske i kommunistiska stater eller i en kultur som dominerades av vänsteråsikter i media och vid universitet? Det hela skall ske genom att skapa ett enhetligt internationellt finansiellt system. Quigley skriver:
In time they brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other. The men who did this…aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers. The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. Rothchild´s five sons, established at branches in Vienna, London, Naples, and Paris, as well as Frankfort, cooperated together in ways which other international banking dynasties copied but rarely excelled. In concentrating, as we must, on the financial or economic activities of international bankers, we must not totally ignore their other attributes. They were, especially in later generations, cosmopolitan rather than nationalistic…